<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times switches from WPF/Silverlight to Flash and AIR for Reader 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1424-new-york-times-switches-from-wpfsilverlight-to-flash-for-reader-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1424-new-york-times-switches-from-wpfsilverlight-to-flash-for-reader-2.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1424-new-york-times-switches-from-wpfsilverlight-to-flash-for-reader-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-131448</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1424-new-york-times-switches-from-wpfsilverlight-to-flash-for-reader-2.html#comment-131448</guid>
		<description>Reporting is not bad, overall.  Oh sure, there are better individual sources, and there are particular sections of the Times that I actively avoid because they&#039;re so damned inaccurate (business and technology).  But compared to the effort it&#039;d take me to piece together an equivalent, I&#039;ll take &quot;the rough draft of history,&quot; however bad it is, over &quot;figure it all out yourself from primary sources.&quot;

It was always surprising that the Times agreed to WPF in the first place.  Mac-heavy reporters, Mac-heavy readers ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reporting is not bad, overall.  Oh sure, there are better individual sources, and there are particular sections of the Times that I actively avoid because they&#8217;re so damned inaccurate (business and technology).  But compared to the effort it&#8217;d take me to piece together an equivalent, I&#8217;ll take &#8220;the rough draft of history,&#8221; however bad it is, over &#8220;figure it all out yourself from primary sources.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was always surprising that the Times agreed to WPF in the first place.  Mac-heavy reporters, Mac-heavy readers &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1424-new-york-times-switches-from-wpfsilverlight-to-flash-for-reader-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-131381</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1424-new-york-times-switches-from-wpfsilverlight-to-flash-for-reader-2.html#comment-131381</guid>
		<description>Online, offline, AIR, or WPF, the reporting is still crap at the NYT...

I can understand the Mac kiddies not wanting to install Silverlight. I have the same feeling about Quicktime. You want me to soil my PC with an Apple product? Not likely...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online, offline, AIR, or WPF, the reporting is still crap at the NYT&#8230;</p>
<p>I can understand the Mac kiddies not wanting to install Silverlight. I have the same feeling about Quicktime. You want me to soil my PC with an Apple product? Not likely&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

