<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome OS &#8211; astonishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-150772</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html#comment-150772</guid>
		<description>Yep as you stated Tim, its just going to be another monopoloy a la M$ really. Net appliances are nothing new, Ellison was touting the &#039;NC&#039; back in the 90s. I guess the biggest changes are ubiquitous (and more reliable) high speed net access and being able to deliver richer UIs using html/javascript.

I&#039;m not sure many large scale organisations will be quick to embrace it unless they can have a server component too which enables them to keep the data in-house.

Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep as you stated Tim, its just going to be another monopoloy a la M$ really. Net appliances are nothing new, Ellison was touting the &#8216;NC&#8217; back in the 90s. I guess the biggest changes are ubiquitous (and more reliable) high speed net access and being able to deliver richer UIs using html/javascript.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure many large scale organisations will be quick to embrace it unless they can have a server component too which enables them to keep the data in-house.</p>
<p>Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lesser</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-149984</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lesser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html#comment-149984</guid>
		<description>While they didn&#039;t say &quot;Gears&quot; they did mention &quot;HTML5 offline access.&quot; 

There was an interesting moment during the Q &amp; A. When asked about Silverlight the answer was they will have more to say about plugins and how binaries are installed in the future. When asked if they were working with Microsoft the answer was a terse &quot;no comment.&quot; After mentioning that Flash works and that they are committed to Flash (codecs etc) that was interesting - not sure what it really means. Perhaps some plugins will be available and some will not?

On privacy, they may have a better story to tell than most people think. But they don&#039;t seem to understand the need to explain exactly what data they will store and how they will use it. Maybe the press briefing wasn&#039;t the place for lots of detail. But the answer to those types of questions are important. Some information is here:

http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/security-overview

and here:

http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/user-accounts-and-management

The security features may be very appealing in an enterprise environment - especially if an enterprise version of Chrome OS connects to enterprise servers behind a firewall to store config and personal information instead of Google storing it on Google&#039;s servers. Since it is all open source, that may not be too difficult for third parties to build without much help from Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they didn&#8217;t say &#8220;Gears&#8221; they did mention &#8220;HTML5 offline access.&#8221; </p>
<p>There was an interesting moment during the Q &amp; A. When asked about Silverlight the answer was they will have more to say about plugins and how binaries are installed in the future. When asked if they were working with Microsoft the answer was a terse &#8220;no comment.&#8221; After mentioning that Flash works and that they are committed to Flash (codecs etc) that was interesting &#8211; not sure what it really means. Perhaps some plugins will be available and some will not?</p>
<p>On privacy, they may have a better story to tell than most people think. But they don&#8217;t seem to understand the need to explain exactly what data they will store and how they will use it. Maybe the press briefing wasn&#8217;t the place for lots of detail. But the answer to those types of questions are important. Some information is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/security-overview" rel="nofollow">http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/security-overview</a></p>
<p>and here:</p>
<p><a href="http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/user-accounts-and-management" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/user-accounts-and-management</a></p>
<p>The security features may be very appealing in an enterprise environment &#8211; especially if an enterprise version of Chrome OS connects to enterprise servers behind a firewall to store config and personal information instead of Google storing it on Google&#8217;s servers. Since it is all open source, that may not be too difficult for third parties to build without much help from Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HF</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-149973</link>
		<dc:creator>HF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html#comment-149973</guid>
		<description>Google already has a tonne of our personal data - emails, blogs, searches, etc... - with Chrome, they will have actual computer usage statistics: where you surf on the net, what you do, buy, who you talk to, etc...

Just because Chrome is Open Source doesn&#039;t mean Google&#039;s Privace Policy is open. What will they do with user data? In fact, what are they doing with it now, and how will this change after Chrome is rolled out? Will they make their policy open and scrutable to users and interested parties? What&#039;s to stop government agencies from employing Google as an information gathering operative (remember, they have already had to turn over data in specific cases)?

Thanks, but no thanks, Mountain View!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google already has a tonne of our personal data &#8211; emails, blogs, searches, etc&#8230; &#8211; with Chrome, they will have actual computer usage statistics: where you surf on the net, what you do, buy, who you talk to, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Just because Chrome is Open Source doesn&#8217;t mean Google&#8217;s Privace Policy is open. What will they do with user data? In fact, what are they doing with it now, and how will this change after Chrome is rolled out? Will they make their policy open and scrutable to users and interested parties? What&#8217;s to stop government agencies from employing Google as an information gathering operative (remember, they have already had to turn over data in specific cases)?</p>
<p>Thanks, but no thanks, Mountain View!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-149963</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html#comment-149963</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s getting near to a games console, where all apps are licensed, things rarely crash (barring hardware errors) and you have a simpler experience navigating around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s getting near to a games console, where all apps are licensed, things rarely crash (barring hardware errors) and you have a simpler experience navigating around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-149935</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html#comment-149935</guid>
		<description>Michael

I&#039;m guessing this is handled by Google Gears, which lets you run web applications offline. Obviously the web app has to be written specifically to support this.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing this is handled by Google Gears, which lets you run web applications offline. Obviously the web app has to be written specifically to support this.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Foord</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-149934</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Foord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1969-google-chrome-os-astonishing.html#comment-149934</guid>
		<description>Are the apps cached on the device as well? I assume so, otherwise if you are out of range of the intarwebs the thing is a brick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the apps cached on the device as well? I assume so, otherwise if you are out of range of the intarwebs the thing is a brick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
