On the plus side, the site looks good, provided you can run Silverlight; and given the target readership that’s not too much of a stretch in this instance. Playing the embedded screencasts is very smooth, and they feel seamlessly integrated with the site, more so than with HTML plus a video plug-in.
That said, I found the site infuriating. Without thinking, I tried to scroll a document using the mouse wheel; nothing happened. The page up and down keys do not work either. Copying text works with Ctrl-C, but if you select and right-click, you just get the Silverlight “about” menu. I also found that the graphic effects – screens typically fade in as they change – made the site seem slow. Some things, like hyperlinks in full-screen mode, did not work as expected.
An interesting experiment; but for a site like this which is mainly about finding and reading documents, its hard to see a good reason not to use HTML.
- Microsoft’s business model for Silverlight
- Silverlight in Microsoft products – Silverlight the new Windows runtime, HTML 5 the new Silverlight?
- No Flash on iPad? No problem – we’ll redesign the site says NPR and others
- MySQL on Windows Azure is expensive and provided by a third-party, spoils web site offer
- Silverlight 4 vs Silverlight 3: a little bit faster?