<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon launches iTunes music store competitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/336-amazon-launches-itunes-music-store-competitor.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/336-amazon-launches-itunes-music-store-competitor.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fifiward</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/336-amazon-launches-itunes-music-store-competitor.html/comment-page-1#comment-38858</link>
		<dc:creator>fifiward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=336#comment-38858</guid>
		<description>I purchase music from iTunes for years. I hate DRM since I don&#039;t have an iPod. I have to burn all music on CD and then rip back. It  is a waste of both time and disc. First I use CD-R disc, but then I find it is more economical to use RW disc, finally I turn to virtual disc, aha , no disc is needed at all. 

PS: Tim, you may write something to introduce a virtual burning program called NoteBurner and it is for burning iTunes music on virtual disc and I think it will be useful for many people. Just a suggestion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchase music from iTunes for years. I hate DRM since I don&#8217;t have an iPod. I have to burn all music on CD and then rip back. It  is a waste of both time and disc. First I use CD-R disc, but then I find it is more economical to use RW disc, finally I turn to virtual disc, aha , no disc is needed at all. </p>
<p>PS: Tim, you may write something to introduce a virtual burning program called NoteBurner and it is for burning iTunes music on virtual disc and I think it will be useful for many people. Just a suggestion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/336-amazon-launches-itunes-music-store-competitor.html/comment-page-1#comment-36431</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=336#comment-36431</guid>
		<description>I wondered if it would be US only. Good thing I&#039;m visiting the US in the next few weeks. I just hope they take my UK credit card. Maybe not. Perhaps it&#039;s time to earn some cash with Mechanical Turk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if it would be US only. Good thing I&#8217;m visiting the US in the next few weeks. I just hope they take my UK credit card. Maybe not. Perhaps it&#8217;s time to earn some cash with Mechanical Turk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/336-amazon-launches-itunes-music-store-competitor.html/comment-page-1#comment-36311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=336#comment-36311</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
256 is not “a little better” than 128. It’s a huge difference, being difficult to distinguish from formats that are not “lossy”.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I was presuming that AAC is better than MP3 at any given bitrate; and allowing for the fact that one person&#039;s &quot;huge difference&quot; is another person&#039;s &quot;little better&quot;, or even indistinguishable. But I agree, it is definitely an improvement.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
256 is not “a little better” than 128. It’s a huge difference, being difficult to distinguish from formats that are not “lossy”.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I was presuming that AAC is better than MP3 at any given bitrate; and allowing for the fact that one person&#8217;s &#8220;huge difference&#8221; is another person&#8217;s &#8220;little better&#8221;, or even indistinguishable. But I agree, it is definitely an improvement.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/336-amazon-launches-itunes-music-store-competitor.html/comment-page-1#comment-36309</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=336#comment-36309</guid>
		<description>256 is not &quot;a little better&quot; than 128. It&#039;s a huge difference, being difficult to distinguish from formats that are not &quot;lossy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>256 is not &#8220;a little better&#8221; than 128. It&#8217;s a huge difference, being difficult to distinguish from formats that are not &#8220;lossy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

