<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent threat lifted from Mono</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/39-patent-threat-lifted-from-mono.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/39-patent-threat-lifted-from-mono.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/39-patent-threat-lifted-from-mono.html/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=39#comment-74</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It seems that this isn’t good news at all. Microsoft threatened Novell with lawsuits and Novell agreed to pay for patents, an agreement that doesn’t cover any other ditribution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes, there are some big questions to be answered, to say the least. This bit from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/patent_agreement.mspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Patent Cooperation Agreement&lt;/a&gt; is a worry:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Enterprises or individuals are not Customers when they (1) resell, license, supply, distribute or otherwise make available to third parties additional copies of the specific cop(ies) of a Covered Product they otherwise utilize as a Customer; or (2) resell, license, supply, or distribute the output of SDKs or embedded developer kits they utilize as a Customer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
On the face of it, this suggests that the aggrement does &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; cover the distribution of Mono applications or indeed Mono itself, other than by Novell to its customers. That won&#039;t help Mono much, sadly, and could even be counter-productive because it may make other distros less inclined to include Mono. But there is also this, from Novell&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/open_letter.mspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;open letter&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;

Microsoft announced today that it will not assert its patents against individual, non-commercial developers. Novell has secured an irrevocable promise from Microsoft to allow individual and non-commercial contributors the freedom to continue open source development, free from any concern of Microsoft patent lawsuits. That&#039;s right, Microsoft wants you to keep hacking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
My quick reading would be: if you use Mono with software purchased from Novell you won&#039;t be sued. If you use Mono non-commercially you won&#039;t be sued. But if you are using Mono in other contexts, the agreement doesn&#039;t give you any comfort. This hasn&#039;t played out yet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It seems that this isn’t good news at all. Microsoft threatened Novell with lawsuits and Novell agreed to pay for patents, an agreement that doesn’t cover any other ditribution.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, there are some big questions to be answered, to say the least. This bit from the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/patent_agreement.mspx" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Patent Cooperation Agreement</a> is a worry:</p>
<blockquote><p>Enterprises or individuals are not Customers when they (1) resell, license, supply, distribute or otherwise make available to third parties additional copies of the specific cop(ies) of a Covered Product they otherwise utilize as a Customer; or (2) resell, license, supply, or distribute the output of SDKs or embedded developer kits they utilize as a Customer.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the face of it, this suggests that the aggrement does <strong>not</strong> cover the distribution of Mono applications or indeed Mono itself, other than by Novell to its customers. That won&#8217;t help Mono much, sadly, and could even be counter-productive because it may make other distros less inclined to include Mono. But there is also this, from Novell&#8217;s <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/open_letter.mspx" rel="nofollow">open letter</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Microsoft announced today that it will not assert its patents against individual, non-commercial developers. Novell has secured an irrevocable promise from Microsoft to allow individual and non-commercial contributors the freedom to continue open source development, free from any concern of Microsoft patent lawsuits. That&#8217;s right, Microsoft wants you to keep hacking.</p></blockquote>
<p>My quick reading would be: if you use Mono with software purchased from Novell you won&#8217;t be sued. If you use Mono non-commercially you won&#8217;t be sued. But if you are using Mono in other contexts, the agreement doesn&#8217;t give you any comfort. This hasn&#8217;t played out yet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/39-patent-threat-lifted-from-mono.html/comment-page-1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=39#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Tim, I&#039;m a Delphi programmer from Spain, subscribed (RSS) to your blog, that I like very much. Have you seen this news in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.groklaw.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Groklaw&lt;/a&gt;? It seems that this isn&#039;t good news at all. Microsoft threatened Novell with lawsuits and Novell agreed to pay for patents, an agreement that doesn&#039;t cover any other ditribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I&#8217;m a Delphi programmer from Spain, subscribed (RSS) to your blog, that I like very much. Have you seen this news in <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/" rel="nofollow">Groklaw</a>? It seems that this isn&#8217;t good news at all. Microsoft threatened Novell with lawsuits and Novell agreed to pay for patents, an agreement that doesn&#8217;t cover any other ditribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

