<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft: OOXML has won approval as an ISO/IEC standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/563-microsoft-ooxml-has-won-approval-as-an-isoiec-standard.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/563-microsoft-ooxml-has-won-approval-as-an-isoiec-standard.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/563-microsoft-ooxml-has-won-approval-as-an-isoiec-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-86214</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=563#comment-86214</guid>
		<description>When I saw the date of this blog entry,  I had to check it twice just in case ISO had also decided to ratify the flight path of penguins as well.

But I agree, it&#039;s a good thing, if only because the ostensible main objection hitherto to the blindingly obvious choice of XML document format in commercial environments has been that it&#039;s not an &#039;official&#039; standard.  This argument is now to all intents and purposes a red herring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the date of this blog entry,  I had to check it twice just in case ISO had also decided to ratify the flight path of penguins as well.</p>
<p>But I agree, it&#8217;s a good thing, if only because the ostensible main objection hitherto to the blindingly obvious choice of XML document format in commercial environments has been that it&#8217;s not an &#8216;official&#8217; standard.  This argument is now to all intents and purposes a red herring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

