<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud gets persistent storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/577-amazon-elastic-compute-cloud-gets-persistent-storage.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/577-amazon-elastic-compute-cloud-gets-persistent-storage.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Wardley</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/577-amazon-elastic-compute-cloud-gets-persistent-storage.html/comment-page-1#comment-88110</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Wardley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=577#comment-88110</guid>
		<description>In my view, the real innovation in GoogleAppEngine is the &lt;a href=&#039;http://blog.gardeviance.org/2008/04/run-rabbit-run-rabbit-run-run-run.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;open SDK&lt;/a&gt; and the possibility that open SDK compliant environments can be &lt;a href=&#039;http://blog.gardeviance.org/2008/04/gae-roundup.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;re-implemented elsewhere&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;i&gt;including on Amazon&#039;s web services&lt;/i&gt;). The difference between Google and Amazon is that Google has taken the approach of creating an open sourced standard and in effect encouraging competition. Amazon has always been about their &lt;a href=&#039;http://blog.gardeviance.org/2007/07/jsops-buy-buy-buy.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;secret sauce&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Whilst GAE is at the level of a framework and Amazon is at the level of infrastructure, the approach of an open sourced standard, if adopted, is likely to spread up and down the stack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my view, the real innovation in GoogleAppEngine is the <a href='http://blog.gardeviance.org/2008/04/run-rabbit-run-rabbit-run-run-run.html' rel="nofollow">open SDK</a> and the possibility that open SDK compliant environments can be <a href='http://blog.gardeviance.org/2008/04/gae-roundup.html' rel="nofollow">re-implemented elsewhere</a> (<i>including on Amazon&#8217;s web services</i>). The difference between Google and Amazon is that Google has taken the approach of creating an open sourced standard and in effect encouraging competition. Amazon has always been about their <a href='http://blog.gardeviance.org/2007/07/jsops-buy-buy-buy.html' rel="nofollow"><i>&#8220;secret sauce&#8221;</i></a>. Whilst GAE is at the level of a framework and Amazon is at the level of infrastructure, the approach of an open sourced standard, if adopted, is likely to spread up and down the stack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

