Office in Windows RT: not licensed for business use?

Journalist Jon Honeyball remarked on Twitter that the version of Microsoft Office in Windows RT, and therefore in the first Microsoft Surface Tablet, is Office Home and Student 2013.

I was sceptical, but it is there on the spec sheet [pdf]:

image

We already knew that Outlook is missing; but now it seems possible that Office in Windows RT is licensed only for non-commercial use. Here is the statement about Office 2010 Home and Student:

I own or work for a small business; can I use Office Home and Student 2010 at my work?

No. Office Home and Student 2010 is licensed only for non-commercial use for members of your household.

Such a restriction would blow so large a hole in the positioning of Windows RT as the ideal BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for business that I am inclined to believe it will be changed for Office in Windows RT.

Then again, Office is a huge business for Microsoft and it is easy to hear the internal debate over this. “You cannot just give it away”.

Another possibility is that Microsoft will come up with some licensing deal which permits use of Office in Windows RT at work, for a suitably Enterprisey fee.

Update: Note that Microsoft has already announced a few things here about Windows RT licensing:

Windows RT Virtual Desktop Access (VDA) Rights: When used as a companion of a Windows Software Assurance licensed PC, Windows RT will automatically receive extended VDA rights. These rights will provide access to a full VDI image running in the datacenter which will make Windows RT a great complementary tablet option for business customers.

Companion Device License: For customers who want to provide full flexibility for how employees access their corporate desktop across devices, we are introducing a new Companion Device License for Windows SA customers. For users of Windows Software Assurance licensed PCs this optional add-on will provide rights to access a corporate desktop either through VDI or Windows To Go on up to four personally owned devices.

This means that if you have a PC licensed with Windows Software Assurance, you can access a virtual desktop from Windows RT without further charge.

Generally, I believe Microsoft also allows you to use Remote Desktop into a physical client without an additional license, provided it is single-user. In other words, only one user at a time can use a physical Windows 7 installation, whether sitting at the machine or remotely.

None of these provisions covers Office on the client though. They are concerned only with remote desktop access of various kinds.

VN:F [1.9.18_1163]
Rate this post
Rating: 9.0/10 (1 vote cast)
Office in Windows RT: not licensed for business use?, 9.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating

Related posts:

  1. Microsoft financials: Server and Office business still growing
  2. Microsoft moves to protect its Office business in format war
  3. Linux users will need a Microsoft Office license to use Office Web Apps
  4. Microsoft financials: Office and server dominate as Windows falters
  5. Microsoft’s muddled licensing for Office Web Apps

1 comment to Office in Windows RT: not licensed for business use?

  • Phil

    I’ve been on vacation and only saw this morning that MS has announced their first PC. The implications of this should be vast, although largely unknown at this point.

    How will MS replace the revenue from Win/Office when they bundle both with a PC “for free”? Horace Dediu thinks that with the right margin and enough sales they could replace the lost revenue as users opt for tablets over OEM PCs. (http://www.asymco.com/2012/06/20/who-will-be-microsofts-tim-cook/)

    Price? The RT Surface compares to the iPad 2 (3rd gen is in entirely different league). iPad 2 starts at US$399 so that’s probably where the RT Surface will start. Since they’re going up against the king of supply chain mgmt, they’ll have to accept lower margins to get to that price. Note that MS has never made much money from devices.

    User desire? Outside of employer-mandated PCs, “Microsoft” almost seems like an anti-brand at times. I don’t know that Apple’s Mac/PC commercials had much to do with this, but it did point out an obvious weakness in the brand.

    Is this the beginning of the end for the big OEMs? Will we see 3-5 big integrated device makers with big ecosystems? Apple, MS, Google obviously. Maybe Samsung? Maybe Amazon? Maybe a Chinese entrant? The problem with Samsung et al is that they’re not software companies like Apple/MS/Google. Substitute a candidate company’s name into “___ Worldwide Developer Conference” and see how ridiculous that sounds.

    I would guess the OEMs are in the middle of all-hands-on-deck meetings this week. Like light from a distant star, these companies will still “exist” in some sense for a while, but they may already be done.

    Thanks.

    -Phil