Comments on: Bet on Entity Framework, not LINQ to SQL http://www.itwriting.com/blog/668-bet-on-adonet-data-services-not-linq-to-sql.html Tech writing blog Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:46:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: tim http://www.itwriting.com/blog/668-bet-on-adonet-data-services-not-linq-to-sql.html/comment-page-1#comment-100498 tim Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:46:07 +0000 http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=668#comment-100498 Roger Thanks, sorry I wasn't thinking straight. I've amended the post. Tim Roger

Thanks, sorry I wasn’t thinking straight. I’ve amended the post.

Tim

]]> By: Roger Jennings http://www.itwriting.com/blog/668-bet-on-adonet-data-services-not-linq-to-sql.html/comment-page-1#comment-100485 Roger Jennings Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:48:06 +0000 http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=668#comment-100485 Hi, Tim, My point was that Entity Framework, not SQL Server Data Services, was a better bet than LINQ to SQL for a production object/relational mapping (O/RM) data layer. My post mentioned ADO.NET Data Services in passing as a client of Entity Framework (as is ASP.NET Dynamic Data.) Cheers, --rj Hi, Tim,

My point was that Entity Framework, not SQL Server Data Services, was a better bet than LINQ to SQL for a production object/relational mapping (O/RM) data layer.

My post mentioned ADO.NET Data Services in passing as a client of Entity Framework (as is ASP.NET Dynamic Data.)

Cheers,

–rj

]]>