<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The RIA dilemma: open vs predictable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/680-the-ria-dilemma-open-vs-predictable.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/680-the-ria-dilemma-open-vs-predictable.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:56:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/680-the-ria-dilemma-open-vs-predictable.html/comment-page-1#comment-101925</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=680#comment-101925</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a really interesting discussion. Aside from the proprietary/open arguments, Silverlight and Flash have the issue of supporting some expected features of [most] HTML such as hyperlinks and bookmarks. And it&#039;s not that those are features that can just be added; they are fundamental differences.

Looking from high up, one may have expected all web apps to be written in Flash long ago, but that hasn&#039;t happened. It&#039;s not totally clear to me why, considering it has 95+% penetration.

A few days ago I wrote a post related to the cyclical nature of the application platform; it seems to apply here:

http://blogs.msdn.com/avip/archive/2008/06/17/the-computing-client-s-yo-yo-diet.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a really interesting discussion. Aside from the proprietary/open arguments, Silverlight and Flash have the issue of supporting some expected features of [most] HTML such as hyperlinks and bookmarks. And it&#8217;s not that those are features that can just be added; they are fundamental differences.</p>
<p>Looking from high up, one may have expected all web apps to be written in Flash long ago, but that hasn&#8217;t happened. It&#8217;s not totally clear to me why, considering it has 95+% penetration.</p>
<p>A few days ago I wrote a post related to the cyclical nature of the application platform; it seems to apply here:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/avip/archive/2008/06/17/the-computing-client-s-yo-yo-diet.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/avip/archive/2008/06/17/the-computing-client-s-yo-yo-diet.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/680-the-ria-dilemma-open-vs-predictable.html/comment-page-1#comment-101767</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=680#comment-101767</guid>
		<description>Ian, Silverlight seems very cool. And I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right. Microsoft is behind it, so it will be more demanded soon. But there are powerful forces out there against a single-vender platform. ActiveX failed. Internet Explorer achieved more than 90% market share but pressure has made it more compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, Silverlight seems very cool. And I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right. Microsoft is behind it, so it will be more demanded soon. But there are powerful forces out there against a single-vender platform. ActiveX failed. Internet Explorer achieved more than 90% market share but pressure has made it more compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/680-the-ria-dilemma-open-vs-predictable.html/comment-page-1#comment-101755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=680#comment-101755</guid>
		<description>Nico - I expect that Silverlight will climb into the &quot;required&quot; section fairly quickly after the release of v2.  It is much more of a tool for developers than Flash, and every .net developer I have discussed this with has embraced it as a better more productive and powerful way of creating web ui than html/js.  

Silverlight can work with any server environment too by the way, and can use ajax/rest etc to communicate with any platform...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nico &#8211; I expect that Silverlight will climb into the &#8220;required&#8221; section fairly quickly after the release of v2.  It is much more of a tool for developers than Flash, and every .net developer I have discussed this with has embraced it as a better more productive and powerful way of creating web ui than html/js.  </p>
<p>Silverlight can work with any server environment too by the way, and can use ajax/rest etc to communicate with any platform&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/680-the-ria-dilemma-open-vs-predictable.html/comment-page-1#comment-101751</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=680#comment-101751</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sticking with HTML and family. In part because it&#039;s what&#039;s worked for me since 1997 and keeps getting better. If I need &quot;richness&quot;, I go desktop with Delphi. For bare functionality, HTML works with whatever server side environment. Incompatibility is not so bad as it used to be.

I guess I&#039;m not their target of Flex or Silverlight, but they&#039;re more aimed to Flash types. The only job offers that contain &quot;flex&quot; or &quot;silverlight&quot; are &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; the ones that mention them at the end of a very long list of &quot;desired&quot; instead of &quot;required&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sticking with HTML and family. In part because it&#8217;s what&#8217;s worked for me since 1997 and keeps getting better. If I need &#8220;richness&#8221;, I go desktop with Delphi. For bare functionality, HTML works with whatever server side environment. Incompatibility is not so bad as it used to be.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m not their target of Flex or Silverlight, but they&#8217;re more aimed to Flash types. The only job offers that contain &#8220;flex&#8221; or &#8220;silverlight&#8221; are <i>still</i> the ones that mention them at the end of a very long list of &#8220;desired&#8221; instead of &#8220;required&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
