<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple accused of security blunder; highlights cloud risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103665</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html#comment-103665</guid>
		<description>@Charles

I&#039;ve fixed the old feed now (I think). There&#039;s a difference, in the the old (deprecated) feed just has a single &lt;description&gt; element for each item. The newer specs have both &lt;description&gt; or &lt;summary&gt; elements as well as a &lt;content&gt; element; this means which one you see depends on the blog reader you are using. For example, if you display the RSS2 feed directly in FireFox, you don&#039;t see the full text even though it is there if you view source.

I hope this is sorted now - it took disproportionate effort to change one line of code.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charles</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve fixed the old feed now (I think). There&#8217;s a difference, in the the old (deprecated) feed just has a single <description> element for each item. The newer specs have both </description><description> or<br />
<summary> elements as well as a <content> element; this means which one you see depends on the blog reader you are using. For example, if you display the RSS2 feed directly in FireFox, you don&#8217;t see the full text even though it is there if you view source.</p>
<p>I hope this is sorted now &#8211; it took disproportionate effort to change one line of code.</p>
<p>Tim</content></summary>
<p></description></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103654</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html#comment-103654</guid>
		<description>Um, have just tried that. Not showing up different in my newsreader (the latest ones are partial posts, but those were collected from the old RSS URL) but maybe it will when there&#039;s a new post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, have just tried that. Not showing up different in my newsreader (the latest ones are partial posts, but those were collected from the old RSS URL) but maybe it will when there&#8217;s a new post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103628</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html#comment-103628</guid>
		<description>@Charles

I&#039;m trying to fix this; but I recommend that you change the feed to:

http://www.itwriting.com/blog/feed

which will most likely work OK.

Thanks for letting me know.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charles</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to fix this; but I recommend that you change the feed to:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/feed" rel="nofollow">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/feed</a></p>
<p>which will most likely work OK.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting me know.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103604</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/713-apple-accused-of-security-blunder-highlights-cloud-risks.html#comment-103604</guid>
		<description>Your RSS feed is missing all the HTML formatting - no para breaks, and no links either! I&#039;m still seeing it (at http://www.itwriting.com/blog/rss.php) but it&#039;s borked. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your RSS feed is missing all the HTML formatting &#8211; no para breaks, and no links either! I&#8217;m still seeing it (at <a href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/rss.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/rss.php</a>) but it&#8217;s borked. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

