The backward march of iPod/MP3 devices

I was astonished to read of how the iLink dock brings digital output to iPod - at a price of $2000 or so. Nearly three years ago I purchased an iRiver H140 for around the same cost as an iPod, but with additional features including built-in digital i/o, mic input with adjustable gain, and direct recording to either MP3 or lossless WAV. I still use the device today – it’s ideal for recording interviews as well as portable music – but when it wears out it may not be easy to replace. Even today, most devices lack these audiophile features or provide them only through expensive and inconvenient add-ons. Lossless recording and digital i/o are hard to find anywhere. Even iRiver’s own range has gone backwards, with nothing comparable currently available.

I’m not sure of all reasons for this, but a big factor is Apple. The dominant iPod may be great on usability and small size, but rich features don’t fit with Apple’s minimalist philosophy. You might think that would give an opportunity to other vendors, but in many cases they seem content to follow rather than innovate.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

VN:F [1.9.18_1163]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Related posts:

  1. Wired votes for Zune over iPod
  2. Apple’s iPod Touch gaming device
  3. New iPod locked more tightly to iTunes, will not work with Linux
  4. iPod database successfully hacked – for now
  5. Review: Sansa’s iPod alternative

2 comments to The backward march of iPod/MP3 devices

  • I have a 6GB SanDisk Sansa e270 and I think it’s a pretty impressive little thing. It’s built to compete with the iPod Nano but includes the ability to record WAV files (and has a replaceable battery). It also has a MicroSD slot and plays videos (if you have good eyesight – its screen is rather small).

    The only drawback I’ve noticed compared with my 5G iPod is that the volume won’t go quite as loud. Probably a good thing for long term health of your hearing, but it does mean you need to buy good quality headphones.

  • Tim

    Thanks for the suggestion Lem, it looks a neat unit. Snags from my point of view would be lack of external mic input (as far as I can see); I’d also miss the digital i/o and the line-in. Still, replaceable battery is good.