<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tim Anderson's ITWriting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tech writing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HP laptop go-slow caused by power supply by MMM</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/985-hp-laptop-go-slow-caused-by-power-supply.html/comment-page-3#comment-1073572</link>
		<dc:creator>MMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/985-hp-laptop-go-slow-caused-by-power-supply.html#comment-1073572</guid>
		<description>Another problem with HP laptops is the battery. I just bought an used DV3000 that the previous owner was selling because it was running incredibly slow. Thankfully he included two batteries: the original one, which was spent, and the replacement one. After two days of tinkering, I finally discovered that the replacement battery, which was a cheap copy, was causing the issue. The laptop ran just fine without the battery, or with the original one installed, even if it was bad. I always try to save as much as possible in replacement parts, but in this case I&#039;ll have to go with genuine, sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem with HP laptops is the battery. I just bought an used DV3000 that the previous owner was selling because it was running incredibly slow. Thankfully he included two batteries: the original one, which was spent, and the replacement one. After two days of tinkering, I finally discovered that the replacement battery, which was a cheap copy, was causing the issue. The laptop ran just fine without the battery, or with the original one installed, even if it was bad. I always try to save as much as possible in replacement parts, but in this case I&#8217;ll have to go with genuine, sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HP laptop go-slow caused by power supply by Vivek Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/985-hp-laptop-go-slow-caused-by-power-supply.html/comment-page-3#comment-1072382</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/985-hp-laptop-go-slow-caused-by-power-supply.html#comment-1072382</guid>
		<description>Most of the time, its the connector and the tip of that cord which are causing the problem, so just order a replacement connector from eBay for like $4 and you&#039;ll have your adapter in perfect working condition.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/260921667223</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the time, its the connector and the tip of that cord which are causing the problem, so just order a replacement connector from eBay for like $4 and you&#8217;ll have your adapter in perfect working condition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/260921667223" rel="nofollow">http://www.ebay.com/itm/260921667223</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows on ARM: Microsoft can write Desktop apps, but you cannot by Neil Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5433-windows-on-arm-microsoft-can-write-desktop-apps-but-you-cannot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071752</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5433#comment-1071752</guid>
		<description>@Fallon Massey - OK, fair enough, substitute Sinofsky for MS in my first line. And it&#039;s obvious I overreacted to your original post, when clearly your POV is perfectly reasonable, so apologies for that.

I should probably declare up front that I&#039;m not a desktop dev. WinRT will not have any significant impact on my work, at least for now. So perhaps I care about that less than someone whose bread and butter is on the desktop. And believe me, I&#039;m not uncritical of Microsoft; far from it. But the &#039;everyone&#039;s doing it&#039; argument is a valid one if not doing it is likely to lead to market failure for Microsoft&#039;s products going forward. I think everyone would agree that they&#039;ve been on a bit of a slide in recent years. Given the choice between a locked-down but rock-solid platform and one that (whether justified or not - and I know to a large extent it&#039;s not) has a reputation for being flaky, which will an average user pick? We&#039;re at the point now where many people can do without a PC altogether and just use a tablet plus a phone. I&#039;d rather MS were the leading provider of tablet OSes than Apple, for sure.

To be clear - I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s a great thing for developers. It isn&#039;t. I have avoided the temptation to even consider developing for iOS precisely because I didn&#039;t want to be dictated to and forced to use MacOS and (shudder) XCode. But I am saying that it&#039;s looking inevitable.

For this generation, at least, you should still be able to get everything you want out of Windows 8 on Intel desktops (or meaty tablets). Stick with Win32 and leave WinRT and Metro for those that want it. I&#039;ll no doubt have Win8 on my desktop from the Consumer Preview onwards, but I&#039;ll still be spending my day in Visual Studio and ASP.NET.

Like you, I guess, I&#039;ve been a career-long MS developer and user. I&#039;ve been through all the great upheavals of the last 20 years - COM, DCOM, Windows DNA, ASP, .NET. I&#039;ve focused on .NET for the last decade, so I guess I&#039;m used to working in a more &#039;managed&#039; environment. I was hopping up and down with the rest of them when it briefly seemed possible that they were going to ditch .NET in favour of HTML5 + Javascript exclusively. 

Come the day that I can no longer make a living writing Web stuff in .NET, I&#039;ll jump ship to wherever I need to go. If that is Java on Linux, or Ruby on Rails, so be it. Though I hope it won&#039;t be :-)

So, once again, apologies for the over-reaction. I see your point, and it&#039;s a valid one. I don&#039;t feel the same, yet, but I suppose I can afford to. For now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fallon Massey &#8211; OK, fair enough, substitute Sinofsky for MS in my first line. And it&#8217;s obvious I overreacted to your original post, when clearly your POV is perfectly reasonable, so apologies for that.</p>
<p>I should probably declare up front that I&#8217;m not a desktop dev. WinRT will not have any significant impact on my work, at least for now. So perhaps I care about that less than someone whose bread and butter is on the desktop. And believe me, I&#8217;m not uncritical of Microsoft; far from it. But the &#8216;everyone&#8217;s doing it&#8217; argument is a valid one if not doing it is likely to lead to market failure for Microsoft&#8217;s products going forward. I think everyone would agree that they&#8217;ve been on a bit of a slide in recent years. Given the choice between a locked-down but rock-solid platform and one that (whether justified or not &#8211; and I know to a large extent it&#8217;s not) has a reputation for being flaky, which will an average user pick? We&#8217;re at the point now where many people can do without a PC altogether and just use a tablet plus a phone. I&#8217;d rather MS were the leading provider of tablet OSes than Apple, for sure.</p>
<p>To be clear &#8211; I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s a great thing for developers. It isn&#8217;t. I have avoided the temptation to even consider developing for iOS precisely because I didn&#8217;t want to be dictated to and forced to use MacOS and (shudder) XCode. But I am saying that it&#8217;s looking inevitable.</p>
<p>For this generation, at least, you should still be able to get everything you want out of Windows 8 on Intel desktops (or meaty tablets). Stick with Win32 and leave WinRT and Metro for those that want it. I&#8217;ll no doubt have Win8 on my desktop from the Consumer Preview onwards, but I&#8217;ll still be spending my day in Visual Studio and ASP.NET.</p>
<p>Like you, I guess, I&#8217;ve been a career-long MS developer and user. I&#8217;ve been through all the great upheavals of the last 20 years &#8211; COM, DCOM, Windows DNA, ASP, .NET. I&#8217;ve focused on .NET for the last decade, so I guess I&#8217;m used to working in a more &#8216;managed&#8217; environment. I was hopping up and down with the rest of them when it briefly seemed possible that they were going to ditch .NET in favour of HTML5 + Javascript exclusively. </p>
<p>Come the day that I can no longer make a living writing Web stuff in .NET, I&#8217;ll jump ship to wherever I need to go. If that is Java on Linux, or Ruby on Rails, so be it. Though I hope it won&#8217;t be <img src='http://www.itwriting.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, once again, apologies for the over-reaction. I see your point, and it&#8217;s a valid one. I don&#8217;t feel the same, yet, but I suppose I can afford to. For now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows on ARM: Microsoft can write Desktop apps, but you cannot by Mihaela MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5433-windows-on-arm-microsoft-can-write-desktop-apps-but-you-cannot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071734</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihaela MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5433#comment-1071734</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t allow anyone to &quot;protect me from myself&quot;. I see such approach of bring aimed to beginners, to say the least (&quot;Idiots&#039;s guide to X&quot;, &quot;Complete moron&#039;s guide to X&quot;). I know I won&#039;t be using WOA. For sure.
Anyway their treatment of developers is a total gibberish. It&#039;s like they cannot make up their minds, C, C++, VB, .net, JavaScript + HTML5... Looks like a lot of management positions have been flipped. No consistency. 
They seem to forget that apps are what made Windows the prevailing platform, and they made it happen with openness (enabling third parties to make clones). Something that Apple religiously forbids.  But Apple doesn&#039;t change platforms (and preferred tools) every now and then. So even it is a closed platform it might get ahead of MS, in Desktop space as well, if they keep on making stupid decisions... Thus saving their platform monopoly (HW ans SW), at no price..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t allow anyone to &#8220;protect me from myself&#8221;. I see such approach of bring aimed to beginners, to say the least (&#8220;Idiots&#8217;s guide to X&#8221;, &#8220;Complete moron&#8217;s guide to X&#8221;). I know I won&#8217;t be using WOA. For sure.<br />
Anyway their treatment of developers is a total gibberish. It&#8217;s like they cannot make up their minds, C, C++, VB, .net, JavaScript + HTML5&#8230; Looks like a lot of management positions have been flipped. No consistency.<br />
They seem to forget that apps are what made Windows the prevailing platform, and they made it happen with openness (enabling third parties to make clones). Something that Apple religiously forbids.  But Apple doesn&#8217;t change platforms (and preferred tools) every now and then. So even it is a closed platform it might get ahead of MS, in Desktop space as well, if they keep on making stupid decisions&#8230; Thus saving their platform monopoly (HW ans SW), at no price..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delphi XE2 FireMonkey for Windows, Mac, iOS: great idea, but is it usable? by Omar</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5039-delphi-xe2-firemonkey-great-idea-but-is-it-usable.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071725</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5039#comment-1071725</guid>
		<description>Delphi has the same price structure since 1995. They only added a few more versions, and increased the confusion. In 95 it made sense to charge more for SQL database connectivity. But today there are many free database components. The extra money for Enterprise version can hardly be justified. The same goes for Architect and Ultimate versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delphi has the same price structure since 1995. They only added a few more versions, and increased the confusion. In 95 it made sense to charge more for SQL database connectivity. But today there are many free database components. The extra money for Enterprise version can hardly be justified. The same goes for Architect and Ultimate versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows on ARM: Microsoft can write Desktop apps, but you cannot by Fallon Massey</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5433-windows-on-arm-microsoft-can-write-desktop-apps-but-you-cannot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071613</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallon Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5433#comment-1071613</guid>
		<description>@Neil Hewitt – Wow, now Sinofosky IS Microsoft?  That speaks volumes about your objectivity and reasoned thought.

I don&#039;t hate Microsoft, I hated Apple when the Mac was top dog because it was so closed!

Microsoft and IBM came along and freed the people with a much more open platform!

Your argument that &quot;Everyone else is doing it&quot; reeks of a teenager trying to cave into peer pressure, it&#039;s childish!

I&#039;m not renting hardware, and I want to access my hard disk in any way I want, and I don&#039;t want my OS deciding what I can and can&#039;t do except within reason.

Granted, we MS developers have little choice right now, MS is still better than Apple from this developers perspective(although the difference is shrinking).  I&#039;m also in total love with Windows 8 server, and we haven&#039;t even been intimate yet, lol.

All I&#039;m saying is that none of this will be forgotten, and the risk MS has embraced is that we will never be blindly loyal again.  The love affair is over, and it&#039;s strictly a business relationship where if we get the chance, we&#039;ll drop them in a NY minute and never look back.

In short, they&#039;ve betrayed their founding principles AND their developers.  I can say that and still develop for Metro, own a Windows Phone(yeah, I&#039;m one of the 5), and develop backend apps on Windows Server... I&#039;m just not as happy as I used to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neil Hewitt – Wow, now Sinofosky IS Microsoft?  That speaks volumes about your objectivity and reasoned thought.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hate Microsoft, I hated Apple when the Mac was top dog because it was so closed!</p>
<p>Microsoft and IBM came along and freed the people with a much more open platform!</p>
<p>Your argument that &#8220;Everyone else is doing it&#8221; reeks of a teenager trying to cave into peer pressure, it&#8217;s childish!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not renting hardware, and I want to access my hard disk in any way I want, and I don&#8217;t want my OS deciding what I can and can&#8217;t do except within reason.</p>
<p>Granted, we MS developers have little choice right now, MS is still better than Apple from this developers perspective(although the difference is shrinking).  I&#8217;m also in total love with Windows 8 server, and we haven&#8217;t even been intimate yet, lol.</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m saying is that none of this will be forgotten, and the risk MS has embraced is that we will never be blindly loyal again.  The love affair is over, and it&#8217;s strictly a business relationship where if we get the chance, we&#8217;ll drop them in a NY minute and never look back.</p>
<p>In short, they&#8217;ve betrayed their founding principles AND their developers.  I can say that and still develop for Metro, own a Windows Phone(yeah, I&#8217;m one of the 5), and develop backend apps on Windows Server&#8230; I&#8217;m just not as happy as I used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows on ARM fixes much that is wrong with Windows, but lack of apps makes it Microsoft&#8217;s big risk by Niclas Lindgren</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5442-windows-on-arm-fixes-much-that-is-wrong-with-windows-but-lack-of-apps-makes-it-microsofts-big-risk.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071603</link>
		<dc:creator>Niclas Lindgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5442#comment-1071603</guid>
		<description>I Think the choice to go this route was fairly easy to take. Because if it doesn&#039;t work out you can still open Pandoras box again, but once it is open you cannot close it.

It will be fascinating to see, you compare with Windows 7 phone, it marvells me that it doesn&#039;t sell better, but the problem lies with the local store more than anything. they don&#039;t put the phone up on display, or if they do they are either out of battery or not properly tended to so that people can actually play with them.

Also WOA will have most apps that will exist for Windows 8 x86, which will give it some momentum by itself.

But I agree, there is no reason or either Windows 8 x86 or WOA to succeed on tablets, it would have been a sure win if the windows 8 tablets would be like a normal Windows 8 desktop, but with the battery Life and convience of an iPad. But I don&#039;t Think they combination can be made to work in the consumer jungle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Think the choice to go this route was fairly easy to take. Because if it doesn&#8217;t work out you can still open Pandoras box again, but once it is open you cannot close it.</p>
<p>It will be fascinating to see, you compare with Windows 7 phone, it marvells me that it doesn&#8217;t sell better, but the problem lies with the local store more than anything. they don&#8217;t put the phone up on display, or if they do they are either out of battery or not properly tended to so that people can actually play with them.</p>
<p>Also WOA will have most apps that will exist for Windows 8 x86, which will give it some momentum by itself.</p>
<p>But I agree, there is no reason or either Windows 8 x86 or WOA to succeed on tablets, it would have been a sure win if the windows 8 tablets would be like a normal Windows 8 desktop, but with the battery Life and convience of an iPad. But I don&#8217;t Think they combination can be made to work in the consumer jungle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows on ARM: Microsoft can write Desktop apps, but you cannot by Niclas Lindgren</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5433-windows-on-arm-microsoft-can-write-desktop-apps-but-you-cannot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071590</link>
		<dc:creator>Niclas Lindgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5433#comment-1071590</guid>
		<description>@Neil - Yes it has been said to be plugin free, but they could include SL into IE10 on WOA without it being a plugin, just a metro style looking app. You will lose the possiblilty to do mashups, but all the LoB apps out there will work as if they were full screen metro apps.

On the other hand, it seems fairly simple to port most of the LoB apps from SL to C#+XAML on metro. I guess I will soon know as I plan to try just that on the CTP.

If that works fairly painless then losing SL won&#039;t matter much, SL was never used for the broad reach, it was used for its productivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neil &#8211; Yes it has been said to be plugin free, but they could include SL into IE10 on WOA without it being a plugin, just a metro style looking app. You will lose the possiblilty to do mashups, but all the LoB apps out there will work as if they were full screen metro apps.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it seems fairly simple to port most of the LoB apps from SL to C#+XAML on metro. I guess I will soon know as I plan to try just that on the CTP.</p>
<p>If that works fairly painless then losing SL won&#8217;t matter much, SL was never used for the broad reach, it was used for its productivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cross-platform Windows and Mac lifts Delphi sales by 54% by gary</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5423-cross-platform-windows-and-mac-lifts-delphi-sales-by-54.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071432</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5423#comment-1071432</guid>
		<description>I cant see massive uptake of xaml, its been around for years and even with inclusion in .net its still a very M$ biased technology which in many ways has been superceded by a plethora of javascript UI frameworks which allow rich UI development for deployment and consumption on *any* platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant see massive uptake of xaml, its been around for years and even with inclusion in .net its still a very M$ biased technology which in many ways has been superceded by a plethora of javascript UI frameworks which allow rich UI development for deployment and consumption on *any* platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows on ARM: Microsoft can write Desktop apps, but you cannot by Neil Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.itwriting.com/blog/5433-windows-on-arm-microsoft-can-write-desktop-apps-but-you-cannot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071294</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?p=5433#comment-1071294</guid>
		<description>@Niclas Lindgren - I think it&#039;s been clarified that desktop IE10 on ARM will not run any plugins. So I would expect the answer on Silverlight is no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niclas Lindgren &#8211; I think it&#8217;s been clarified that desktop IE10 on ARM will not run any plugins. So I would expect the answer on Silverlight is no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

