Ian Rogers at Yahoo! Music says no to DRM

Great and impassioned article from Ian Rogers, who works for Yahoo! Music, on why he is not accepting any more customer-unfriendly schemes from the music industry. He’s an interesting guy who used to run Winamp.com. Now he is reflecting on the failure of Yahoo! Music:

I’m here to tell you today that I for one am no longer going to fall into this trap. If the licensing labels offer their content to Yahoo! put more barriers in front of the users, I’m not interested. Do what you feel you need to do for your business, I’ll be polite, say thank you, and decline to sign. I won’t let Yahoo! invest any more money in consumer inconvenience.

For a little historical perspective, see here for the same author’s more positive view, on the launch of Yahoo! Music in May 2005.

I feel I played my own small part in this. When I tried the Yahoo! Music service two and a half years ago, I was appalled by the way it installed and posted a blog article about it, which still gets occasional comments from frustrated users.

DRM is actually only part of the problem here. The other part is that apparently nobody other than Apple can write software that makes dealing with DRM-ed music half-way tolerable. Given how much is at stake, I find this extraordinary. It’s not clear to me how many of the issues are Microsoft’s fault, and how many down to third parties like Yahoo! or the BBC (see my comments on iPlayer, which also uses Microsoft DRM).

The point of interest now is whether the inherent disadvantages of DRM will be enough to unseat Apple from its market dominance with iTunes.

Charles Fitzgerald: Oracle will buy Salesforce.com

I enjoyed this thoughtful post on Fitzgerald’s Platformonomics blog. I am personally guilty of thinking too much about technology and not enough about the bottom line; this kind of analysis is a useful corrective, though bear in mind that it comes from a competitor to both companies.

It is true that Salesforce.com is an Oracle company at heart, a point that has been made to me several times when I have talked to its spokespeople. It is a platform for database applications, and the database is … you guessed.

Hosted platforms and the risk of lock-in

Two interesting posts for anyone considering building an application on a hosted platform like force.com (Salesforce). Onstartups has a thoughtful article about what it would be like to succeed on such a platform, and how much money and control you might end up ceding to the hosting vendor. Bob Warfield’s Smoothspan blog takes up the theme with a response that is longer than the original. What does it all boil down to? This, I think (from Smoothspan):

First, it has to be possible for you to move your software in a reasonable amount of time to new lodging if it gets too ugly.

As Smoothspan notes, this is what makes a service like Amazon S3, which you can easily switch out for another service, more attractive from this point of view than force.com, with its proprietary Apex language and forms.

That does not mean force.com is necessarily a bad deal. It means there has to be a lot of added value – such as productivity, high-level components, rich services – before it makes business sense to accept the lock-in.

New Silverlight book with live web coding examples

Adam Nathan is supporting his new book on Silverlight 1.0 with live code examples. This means you can modify the code in the browser and see the Silverlight canvas immediately update. It is a excellent way to get an idea of how the XAML works.

Of course you can easily invalidate the code, in which case you get a parser error.

Works on FireFox; not tried it on the Mac.

Technorati tags: , ,