{"id":10044,"date":"2013-02-09T21:35:22","date_gmt":"2013-02-09T21:35:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gadgets.itwriting.com\/?p=1958"},"modified":"2013-02-09T21:35:22","modified_gmt":"2013-02-09T21:35:22","slug":"hi-res-audio-and-the-hi-fi-press-the-problem-with-honesty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/10044-hi-res-audio-and-the-hi-fi-press-the-problem-with-honesty.html","title":{"rendered":"Hi-res audio and the hi-fi press: the problem with honesty"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have posted several articles on the subject of high resolution audio \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/articles\/is-high-resolution-audio-like-sacd-audibly-better-than-than-cd\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>, for example. It is a subject that fascinates me. I enjoy music more if it is accurately reproduced, and regard sound quality as something worth paying for, but is it worth investing in high resolution formats such as SACD, DVD Audio, 24\/96 and higher FLAC or ALAC (Apple\u2019s lossless audio format); or is it better to concentrate on other parts of the audio chain, on the grounds that even lowly CD and 16\/44 capture music with an accuracy close to the limits of what human hearing can perceive?  <\/p>\n<p>Many audio enthusiasts swear that high-res formats sound much better; but solid evidence for their superiority as a delivery format is hard to come by, and when you perform simple tests like converting a high-res format into one at CD resolution and comparing the two, it is often (perhaps always) hard to hear any difference.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>High resolution formats are of course a necessity in music production, where the sound will be processed, possibly many times over, before the final master is complete.  <\/p>\n<p>Alan Sircom is the editor of the UK audio magazine <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hifiplus.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">hi-fi plus<\/a>. In a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pinkfishmedia.net\/forum\/showpost.php?p=1923239&amp;postcount=54\" target=\"_blank\">frank forum discussion<\/a> concerning the challenges of editing such a magazine today he makes the following remark:  <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>For all the enmity you and yours have toward the magazine, our biggest potential loss of readers right now is coming from my stance on hi-res. I still maintain that you are paying a premium for microphone thermal noise and &#8211; at best &#8211; a more careful mastering process. I know a lot of manufacturers of DACs who (privately) agree with me&#8230; but have to continue to develop their products from 24\/96 to 24\/192 to 32\/384 to DSD-over-USB because the audiophiles (who, let&#8217;s face it, buy our stuff) will not accept anything less. This is a sham, especially as there is a better campaign to be had (something like &#8220;brick-wall mastering is worse than brick-wall filtering&#8221;, but more pithy). However, the upshot of the excellent expos\u00e9 of the hi-res game by Hi-Fi News did not cause an army of hi-res-loving audiophiles demanding more from their hi-res, it caused some of them to consider Hi-Fi News &#8216;hostile&#8217; to hi-res.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>If true, this is a depressing situation. The goal of home audio is to achieve the best possible sound at home within your budget, which means investing in the technology that makes the most audible difference. It is not easy to discern what that is though, which is where an independent press has a valuable role to play. According Sircom, that is difficult to do in practice, because of the constraints imposed by the economics of advertising at one end, and a readership which does not always want to hear the truth at the other.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have posted several articles on the subject of high resolution audio \u2013 here, for example. It is a subject that fascinates me. I enjoy music more if it is accurately reproduced, and regard sound quality as something worth paying for, but is it worth investing in high resolution formats such as SACD, DVD Audio, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/10044-hi-res-audio-and-the-hi-fi-press-the-problem-with-honesty.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Hi-res audio and the hi-fi press: the problem with honesty<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1064],"tags":[176,452,1288],"class_list":["post-10044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-audio","tag-audio","tag-hifi","tag-high-resolution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.itwriting.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}