Ruby on Rails on .NET

Microsoft’s John Lam reports:

IronRuby dispatched some simple requests through an unmodified copy of Rails a few days ago. Today, we’re going to show off our progress live at RailsConf.

He adds that performance is terrible; so you might not want to migrate your project just yet. Why bother? Mainly, to get Rails productivity plus access to .NET libraries – in other words, integration with Microsoft’s platform.

Technorati tags: , , , ,
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Related posts:

  1. CodeGear’s Ruby on Rails IDE is released
  2. Microsoft Ruby
  3. Ruby interpreter flaws make the case for JRuby?
  4. Microsoft hires Ruby .NET expert
  5. Amethyst from SapphireSteel: Develop Flex in Visual Studio, an alternative to Tofino

1 comment to Ruby on Rails on .NET

  • Edward Royce

    Hmmm.

    How would you compare Ruby on Rails vs PHP or Python?

    I’m curious as I’m thinking of a couple websites I’d like to do as side projects and I’m not sure which of these technologies I’d like to learn.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>