A few good things about Bing – but where is the webmaster’s guide?

So Bing (Bing Is Not Google?) is Microsoft’s new search brand. A few good things about it:

1. Short memorable name, short memorable url

2. Judging by the official video at http://www.decisionengine.com/ Microsoft realises that it has to do something different than Google; doing the same thing almost as well or even just a little better is not enough.

3. Some of the ideas are interesting – morphing the results and the way they are displayed according to the type of search, for example. In the video we see a search for a digital camera that aggregates user reviews from all over the Internet (supposedly); whereas searching for a flight gets you a list of flight offers with fares highlighted.

This kind of thing should work well with microformats, about which Google and Yahoo have also been talking – see my recent post here. But does Bing use them? That’s unknown at the moment, because the Bing Reviewer’s Guide says little about how Bing derives its results. I don’t expect Microsoft to give away its commercial secrets,  but it does have a responsibility to explain how web authors can optimise their sites for Bing – presuming that it has sufficient success to be interesting. Where is the webmaster’s guide?

Some things are troubling. The Bing press material I’ve seen so far is relentlessly commercial, tending to treat users as fodder for ecommerce. While I am sure this is how many businesses perceive them – why else do you want users to come to your site? – it is not a user-centric view. Most searches do not result in a purchase.

There’s a snippet in the reviewer’s guide about why Bing will deliver trustworthy results for medical searches:

Bing Health provides you with access to medical information from nine trusted medical resources, including the Mayo Clinic, the American Cancer Society and MedlinePlus.

No doubt these are trusted names in the USA. Still, reliance on a few trusted brands, while it is good for safety in a sensitive area such as health, is also a route to a dull and sanitized version of the Internet. I am sure there are far more than nine reliable sources of medical information on the Web; and if Bing takes off those others will want to know why they have been excluded.

Back to the introduction in the Reviewer’s Guide:

In a world of excessive choice and too much information, it’s often difficult to make the right decision. What you need is more than just a search engine; you need a decision engine that provides useful tools to help you get what you want fast, rather than simply presenting a list of Web links. Bing is such a decision engine. It provides an easy way to make more informed choices. It organizes popular results by category to help you get the answers you’re looking for without having to guess at the right way to formulate your query. And built right into Bing is a set of intelligent tools to help you accomplish important tasks such as buying a product, planning a trip or finding a local business.

Like many of us, I’ve been searching the web since its earliest days. I found portals and indexes like early Yahoo and dmoz unhelpful: always out of date, never sufficiently thorough. I used DEC’s AltaVista instead, because it seemed to search everywhere. Google came along and did the same thing, but better. Too much categorization and supposed intelligence can work against you, if it hides the result that you really want to see.

Live Search, I’ve come to realise (or theorise), frequently delivers terrible results for me because of faulty localization. It detects that I am in the UK and prioritises what it things are UK results, even though for most of my searches I only care about the quality of the information, not where the web sites are located. It’s another example of the search engine trying to be smart, and ending up with worse results than if it had not bothered.

Still, I’ll undoubtedly try Bing extensively as soon as I can; I do like some of its ideas and will judge it with an open mind.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,
VN:F [1.9.18_1163]
Rate this post
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
A few good things about Bing – but where is the webmaster’s guide?, 10.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating

Related posts:

  1. Bing’s disappearing search share gain in the US
  2. Bing, Blind Search and electoral fraud
  3. Five things right, five things wrong from Microsoft in 2008
  4. Google+, Bing social search, and internet monopolies
  5. Why doesn’t Adobe’s AIR dev guide mention SQLite?

4 comments to A few good things about Bing – but where is the webmaster’s guide?

  • Clyde Davies

    Tried Wolfram Alpha yet? I did. I’m not impressed. I was born on August 28, 1963. Something very important happened on that day in the USA. Alpha’s response is:
    Notable events for August 28, 1963:
    (no known major notable events)

    Try putting the same date into Google.

  • it doesnt matter what the compertion do google will be king forever
    look at microsoft vs apple

    Apple is beter machines and overall company but micro still king in the eyes of the average jo!

    sometimes is just easyier to look and go its works so lets leave it like that and ivent something that is new and worthwhile

    my 2c

    theblob

  • Oh dear, blind brand loyalty alert.

    For starters, Apple hardware is NOT better as Microsoft would have to actually design/manufacture Windows PCs for that argument to work, which they do not. The fact is on PC you get to choose, do you want a cheapo “it will do” PC or go for a Apple-like “rock solid built” one.

    I can get an Acer laptop (in fact, I did) less than half the price of an Apple which the same hardware inside. Sure it doesn’t have that Apple casing, but personally I am looking at the internal specifications when I buy a computer not the shiny surface. The last time I did that I bought a Sony PSP and regretted it ever since as I realised it was designed to look good rather than be comfortable to play games on (it cramps my hand within minutes of use).

    Apple made their reputation on simple, easy to use, hard to break (because its so simple) software. Part of that was by strict controls over hardware, so Mac OS does not need to support the diverse range of hardware Windows and Linux does. Also as they used to use a completely different CPU architecture it meant they had a much smaller variety of software to clog the machine up with.

    Basically, if users put as much crap on Mac OS as your average Windows user does, I am betting it would have problems too. But people are more likely to keep a Mac neat and tidy (they had no choice for so long as Mac OS had such a small range of software compared to PC) thus building into the image that its more stable.

    As always, the biggest factor on any computer is whats between the chair and the keyboard. If you only install one or two programs on your Windows PC it will remain reliable, so long as you do not get it clogged with spyware/viruses which again is not Microsoft at fault but simply that they are the biggest target.

    If Apple are so good, where is my Linux iTunes client? Why does Quicktime always run worse on Windows than on Mac OS and again has no official support on Linux at all?
    Because they wanted to keep the illusion that Mac OS is better than Windows that is why. They were hoping people would go “Argh, stupid Windows. I’m gonna get a Mac!” which some people actually fell for it.

  • I too was searching for the webmaster’s guide… Thanks for the info dude… I liked a Big lot… But Google has become a habit!