What’s on at Mix 2010 – some surprises as Microsoft talks standards

Microsoft’s Mix conference is on next month – probably the company’s second most interesting conference after PDC, though this Mix looks rather better than last year’s relatively drab PDC (free laptops aside). The company has plenty to talk about, primarily around Windows Phone development – twelve sessions! – Internet Explorer 9, and Silverlight 4. Mix is meant to be a web design conference – though it has always strayed extensively into Windows-only territory – and the inclusion of Windows Phone is a bit of a stretch, but I doubt attendees will care.

It’s notable that Microsoft is making more than a nod to web standards and open source. There is a full day workshop from Molly Holzschlag on HTML5 Now: The Future of Web Markup Today, John Resig on How jQuery Makes Hard Things Simple, and Doug Schepers from the W3C with Microsoft’s Patrick Dengler on SVG: The Past, Present and Future of Vector Graphics for the Web; Christian Heilmann on Participating in the Web of Data with Open Standards; and not forgetting Miguel de Icaza on The Mono Project.

Why would Microsoft talk about such things? Arguably it is a kind of smokescreen, talking standards while busily promoting proprietary stuff like SharePoint and Silverlight. I think there is some of that; but that this new focus also reflects power shifts in the industry. In the new cloud-based era Microsoft has to compete with Google, Mozilla and others; and to make sure that its stuff works in some measure on a diversity of clients, from Android to iPhone. Note the session on Practical Strategies for Debugging Cross-Browser Display Issues.

I would not call this a conversion. I would say this is more about “Windows if we can, standards if we must”. That necessity is increasing though, and the sessions at Mix reflect that.

3 thoughts on “What’s on at Mix 2010 – some surprises as Microsoft talks standards”

  1. Wow, it does look like MS is either trying to do the right thing (with open standards) or trying to *look like* it’s doing the right thing. I know which on I’m picking. Will believe it when I see it. Funny who the only time MS talks standards is when its attempts to force people into its proprietary walled gardens are failing miserably and its marketshare is dropping like stone. Have a look at the IE dev team’s blog posts – *half* the comments are saying: “drop IE’s Trident engine, switch to Webkit or Gecko and build a real browser (that adheres to open standards)”. Chuck “Silverlight” into the bin where it belongs while you’re at it. MS have 15 years of bad faith to overcome with the software community – it’s going to take a lot more than a few talks to dig themselves out of that hole. It’ll take positive *action* and *consistent* support across the corporation. That means ditching Ballmer. I wish them luck, but I don’t think they can present a united front. They went off into the weeds ages ago.

  2. Oh, and by the way: it might be “open source” (strictly speaking) but if it depends on a proprietary Microsoft stack, then it’s of no interest. Period.

  3. Sorry ’bout the typos in my first post – on -> one and who -> how. I note that all the Mix pages linked in the original article above seem to have a basic HTML error which keeps them from displaying anything but an XML error… Doh. Even the big boys make syntax errors sometimes, eh 🙂

Comments are closed.