October 10, 2006
If Microsoft doesn't use UAC, why should anyone else?Posted 3413 days ago on October 10, 2006
This posting has moved. For the current version with comments, please click here
Hey Doug, I don't want to pick on you but this...
There are a few things about Vista that most "power user" types change, and so have I. I have the UAC stuff disabled, since I'm installing and configuring so much software right now that it just feels in the way.
Doug Mahugh is a technical evangelist for Office 2007, and this is from his blog. He's probably one among many Microsoft folk disabling UAC - though I hope otherwise - but it's a big mistake.
What's the biggest problem with Windows right now? Security, right. And what's the centrepiece of Vista's security solution? UAC, right. So it strikes me that anyone evangelising Microsoft software should be evangelising UAC as well.
There's more. Consider Outlook, for a long time a decent Exchange client, but a poor standalone email client and PIM (Personal Information Manager). One of the reasons is that everyone at Microsoft uses Exchange. So they didn't suffer the problems of standalone Outlook, so they didn't beat up the product team about it, so the problems went unfixed.
More than anyone, Microsoft folk need to use UAC and ensure that it works right.
Bottom line: don't disable UAC.
Comments are closed
Recent postsUsers plead with Borland to give up .NET
IE7 to be released 18th October,...
If Microsoft doesn't use UAC, why...
Google's unsettling lack of direction
Vista security: now prove it