Microsoft refuses to comment as .NET developers fret about Windows 8

There is a long discussion over on the official Silverlight forum about Microsoft’s Windows 8 demo at D9 and what was said, and not said; and another over on Channel 9, Microsoft’s video-centric community site for developers.

At D9 Microsoft showed that Windows 8 has a dual personality. In one mode it has a touch-centric user interface which is an evolved version of what is on Windows Phone 7. In another mode, just a swipe away, it is the old Windows 7, plus whatever incremental improvements Microsoft may add. Let’s call it the Tiled mode and the Classic mode.

Pretty much everything that runs on Windows today will likely still run on Windows 8, in its Classic mode. However, the Tiled mode has a new development platform based on HTML and JavaScript, exploiting the rich features of HTML 5, and the fast JavaScript engine and hardware acceleration in the latest Internet Explorer.

Although D9 is not a developer event, Microsoft did talk specifically about this aspect. Here is the press release:

Today, we also talked a bit about how developers will build apps for the new system. Windows 8 apps use the power of HTML5, tapping into the native capabilities of Windows using standard JavaScript and HTML to deliver new kinds of experiences. These new Windows 8 apps are full-screen and touch-optimized, and they easily integrate with the capabilities of the new Windows user interface. There’s much more to the platform, capabilities and tools than we showed today.

Program Manager Jensen Harris says in the preview video:

We introduced a new platform based on standard web technologies

Microsoft made no mention of either Silverlight or .NET, even though Silverlight is used as the development platform in Windows Phone 7, from which Windows 8 Tiled mode draws its inspiration.

The fear of .NET developers is that Microsoft’s Windows team now regards not only Silverlight but also .NET on the client as a legacy technology. Everything will still run, but to take full advantage of Tiled mode you will need to use the new HTML and JavaScript model. Here are a couple of sample comments. This:

My biggest fears coming into Windows 8 was that, as a mostly WPF+.NET developer, was that they would shift everything to Silverlight and leave the FULL platform (can you write a Visual Studio in Silverlight? of course not, not designed for that) in the dust. To my utter shock, they did something much, much, much worse.

and this:

We are not Windows developers because we love Windows. We put up with Windows so we can use C#, F# and VS2010. I’ve considered changing the platform many times. What stops me each time is the goodness that keeps coming from devdiv. LINQ, Rx, TPL, async – these are the reasons I’m still on Windows.

Underlying the discussion is that developers have clients, and clients want applications that run on a platform with a future. Currently, Microsoft is promoting HTML and JavaScript as the future for Windows applications, putting every client-side .NET developer at a disadvantage in those pitches.

What is curious is that the developer tools division at Microsoft, part of Server and Tools, has continued to support and promote .NET; and in fact Microsoft is soon to deliver Visual Studio LightSwitch, a new edition of Visual Studio that generates only Silverlight applications. Microsoft is also using Silverlight for a number of its own web user interfaces, such as for Azure, System Center and Windows InTune, as noted here.

Now, I still expect that both Silverlight and native code, possibly with some new XAML-based tool, will be supported for Windows 8 Tiled mode. But Microsoft has not said so; and may remain silent until the Build conference in September according to .NET community manager Pete Brown:

You all saw a very small technology demo of Windows 8, and a brief press release. We’re all being quiet right now because we can’t comment on this. It’s not because we don’t care, aren’t listening, have given up, or are agreeing or disagreeing with you on something. All I can say for now is to please wait until September. If we say more before then, that will be great, but there are no promises (and I’m not aware of any plans) to say more right now. I’m very sorry that there’s nothing else to share at the moment. I know that answer is terrible, but it’s all that we can say right now. Seriously.

While this is clearly not Brown’s fault, this is poor developer communication and PR from Microsoft. The fact that .NET and Silverlight champion Scott Guthrie is moving to Windows Azure is no comfort.

The developer division, and in fact the whole of Server and Tools, has long been a bright spot at Microsoft and among its most consistent performers. The .NET story overall includes some bumps, but as a platform for business applications it has been a remarkable success. The C# language has evolved rapidly and effectively under the guidance of Technical Fellow Anders Hejlsberg. It would be bewildering if Microsoft were to turn its back on .NET, even if only on the client.

In fact, it is bewildering that Microsoft is being so careless with this critical part of its platform, even if this turns out to be more to do with communication than technical factors.

From the outside, it still looks as if Microsoft’s server and tools division is pulling one way, and the Windows team the other. If that is the case, it is destructive, and something CEO Steve Ballmer should address; though I imagine that Steven Sinofsky, the man who steered Windows 7 to launch so successfully, is a hard person to oppose even for the CEO.

Update: Journalist Mary Jo Foley has posted on what she “hears from my contacts” about Jupiter:

Jupiter is a user interface library for Windows and will allow developers to build immersive applications using a XAML-based approach with coming tools from Microsoft. Jupiter will allow users a choice of programming languages, namely, C#, Visual Basic and C++.

Jupiter, presuming her sources are accurate, is the managed code platform for the new Windows shell – “Tiled mode” or “Tailored Apps” or “Modern Shell – MoSH”; though if that is the case, I am not sure whether C++ in this context will compile to managed or unmanaged code. Since Silverlight is already a way to code using XAML, it is also not clear to me whether Jupiter is in effect a new Windows-only version of Silverlight, or yet another approach.

Related posts:

  1. Where is Microsoft going with its Rich Client API? Microsoft drops some clues as developers fret
  2. Flash developers fret as Adobe doubles down on PhoneGap
  3. Microsoft really, really wants developers to build Windows Runtime apps
  4. Windows Phone 7 incompatibility may drive developers elsewhere
  5. Microsoft appeals to Windows 8 Metro developers not to stray from the official API

53 comments to Microsoft refuses to comment as .NET developers fret about Windows 8

  • We are all Symbian developers now. 🙂

    The funniest thing is that to prepare yourself for Windows 8, you should abandon Windows Phone and turn to ChromeOS and Android tablets ASAP.

  • Craig

    While the future of Silverlight is unknown, there is no chance the .NET framework will be depreciated. HTML5 can only provide 1% of the functionality of .NET. It is a front end technology not a complete package.

  • tim


    On the server I agree. But on the client, if it is not Silverlight, what is it? WPF? Winforms? Something new?


  • Andrew

    Great article. Will Micorsoft never learn. The lack of communication is shocking, how do they expect any of their platforms to expand if they are unbale to decide for themselves what their plans are for development. However great the tools are do they really expect developers to wait around while they finish arguing internally. If they do decide to drop WPF, Silverlight or .NET at least hurry and decide, demonstrate what the alternative is and let people start to move on. At the moment nobody can plan anything with any degree of certainty. Patience and good will is running out very quickly.

  • Tim, who knows what it will be. I will be focusing on HTML5 and other ‘standard’ web technologies for the front end. At least they have support outside of Microsoft.

  • Nice summary Tim.

    Every time I think Microsoft can’t possibly make a bigger screw-up of something they prove me wrong and go one step further and this is just the latest example. Honestly, it’s unbelievable.

    We had the Windows Phone changing message re “It’s for consumer devices not business ones but it’s for business as well”, “It’s all about consistent UX which we’ll completely ignore in our greed to get as many apps as possible into the app store”, “We’re open now, but you can’t tweet or blog what I’m about to say even though this is a user group not a Microsoft event and nobody’s signed a disclaimer”, the “Silverlight is being realigned” PDC announcement from Muglia that seems to have got him fired on the back of all the “Silverlight is dead” stories that then erupted, pre-MIX 11 “Yes Silverlight is being realigned” Guthrie and co announcement that had got Muglia fired but seeningly Guthrie reassigned to Azure, the “Use HTML5 for reach, use Silverlight for Reach” message that became “Er. Forget that. Use ‘Native HTML5′ for reach” MIX 11 keynote, the MIX 11 day 2 keynote that proved Silverlight was still alive for line of business apps … by demonstrating a bizarre 3D house application and promoting a web site for the Blue Devils that’s written in HTML5 and Flash.

    The list of sheeer incompetence just goes on and on, and now this. I wonder how many .NET/Silverlight/WPF developes like me are now spending as much time in JetBrains’ WebStorm IDE playing with JavaScript HTML5 and CSS as they used to spend in Visual Studio or Blend.

    The Windows 8 early demo was a brilliant way for Microsoft to accellerate their own inevitable decline!

  • Frank Larson

    Bravo Microsoft!

  • g@wicks

    Microsoft is not going to throw all the years of investment in managed languages out of the window that’s just crazy!
    Microsoft doesn’t want to comment on what’s going on.Obviously it’s still work in progress. Anders spoke about the future of .Net at PDC last year so it’s highly likely that we’ll be seeing a beta of VS:next at BUILD this year. And possibly even Redhawk.
    The developer story will be clarified at BUILD .Why would they need to hold a huge conference just to speak about HTML5?

  • tim

    While I agree with you, it is not surprising that .NET developers worry when Microsoft comes out and says the new Windows client platform is for HTML and JavaScript. It would have been easy to add that there is a great .NET story too but we are keeping it under wraps.


  • Sounds like a great advertisement for Python.


  • Peter

    You wrote something on bas assumptions, Microsoft still has the best develping environment and for sure they will not put that away.

    Maybe you forget microsoft invented Webdav standard
    In simple very terms be able to html “POST” commands and return something.
    The posting could go straight to a dll or whatever you code, this new view is this about the view that could be done in HTML 5 and from what i understand .net needed also a interface based on code, it couldnt get better by using html5

    I really like to see those things come together web development and classic apps to fuse their GUI (most involved in visual studio, knew these where always nearby > but new vs studio makes it even more easy.

    The fear you speak about in this article, is about that your overwhelmed by Microsoft technologies, your not sure what to choose, maybe if you where a real programmer you wouldnt be that afright. If you programmed c++ for the last ten years i wouldnt call you a programmer rather a dinosaur, things have changed you know the world invented new things.
    A true programmer has learned more then one language, and would always be on the lookout for new possibilities, with this MS made real cool possiblities, finally things come together.
    Web developers / device / platform /server rather are exciting times

  • It’s the usual MS move. It’s why I stopped working on Windows after being F’d in the A from with DCOM / ActiveX.

    Developers are not the customers, they are the product.

  • Fortis Bonitas

    For all of you who think Microsoft won’t drop .net. Ask the millions of ex VB programmers (not out there if it’s possible. I was a Microsoft dev for a long time in the 90s and early 2000s. I learned what Microsoft said to learn, all the technologies they said were the future. Only to get burned time and time again. Them dropping everything to switch to .net was the last straw.

    Eventually I switched to Java, then to open source languages such as Pyhton and Ruby. Never again will I work in a language that is controlled by one company.

  • Josh Korn

    To go one better than Wayne, it sounds like a great advertisement for *Monty Python*.

    From now on, Microsoft should have John Cleese do its product announcements. At least they’d be funny.

  • Much as I can understand all the frustration in not getting response back from MSFT, I didn’t expect this to raise as much dust as it is. Personally, I believe that a unified way of designing and rending UI for web and non-web is the way of this era.
    The package I see being introduced for Windows 8 is situation where the Markup just changes from XAML to HTML5 and JavaScript. You still get everything you get today beyond the UI hood.
    I don’t even know how speculating that “.NET is dying” comes into the picture at all. Of course, .NET is not dying and has no reason to. .NET has no UI markup/rendering subsystem. It has always depended on something else to do that. Before now it was HTML4 for Web, WinFroms and XAML for Windows.
    Now, moving the markup/rendering subsystem up to use HTML5 is the only upgrade I see and that is the way the World is going right now. I hate to have to speak to my colleagues: Flash and Silverlight already have their obituaries written by HTML5. You know that, don’t you? It’s only a matter of when. And I’d rather now than later.
    We asked Microsoft to exit their silo and embrace common standards. Now, they are waking up to it and why do we appear to be quaking in our boots?
    I am already imagining all the cool things that can happen when the UI of Windows uses standard web technologies. I’m excited to imagine how much little help it will take to port my native Windows App to become a web App that you can open in a linux browser. I can also see the possibility of pulling a web app into a sandbox on windows to improve scaleability and processing power.
    Let’s just relax a little. All this quaking is making me thirsty.

  • Georgi Gurgutov

    I see only one thing,that happens over and over again, when Mr.Sinofsky make a statement, the Microsoft Dev Team take a kick in the ass.

  • Tom Conlon

    @tim I’m inclined to disagree with you earlier response: “On the server I’d agree …”

    Even on the server, with node.js (and other recent server-side javascript developments) perhaps, as this seems to often happen in history, things are actually going full circle.

    from the ‘tower of babel’ that is the vast number of current languages/frameworks/devices/etc perhaps the movement towards a simpler and unified way of doing things is what is needed and occurring right now.

  • Bob Wilson

    C#.Net Web applications (along with Java) have been taking such a strong hold of business IT departments that it was a sure thing. But, just as with the appearance of the web, MSFT eventually smells the rot of their long-outdated technologies. The world does not want monitors and windows and operating systems and keyboards and mice and other old-school techno-nerd clunkers. The world wants what Google and Apple are delivering. The world wants portability and ease-of-use and attractive-simple design. Windows 8 might be the bridge from the desktop client PC to some kind of iPad-like, Chrome-like Worktop, always connected to “the cloud”.

    Developers using MSFT technologies must always keep one foot in the open, web standards world that is steamrolling over the Windows world. The other foot probably should be in the Android/iPhone/iPad world. No more feet left for Redmond.

  • Vic Klien

    Is this a developer messaging PR “blunder” for MS? Maybe a bit, but after the similar PDC2010 controversy, they must have expected some of this.

    Why did they allow it to happen? Apparently MS’s top level decided this “collateral damage” was a price worth paying.

    MS has far bigger problems than causing anxiety among SL/WPF devs. They’re bigger challenge is to find a response to the momentum of Apple and Google. One way to do that is to “embrace” HTML5/JS and tie it to Windows.

    If you are a SL/WPF dev (like me), you already drank the Kool-Aid a long time ago, and are unlikely to going anywhere. If you’re writing LOB or similar apps with SL/WPF, where are you going to go?

    To get the attention of the wider world, MS needs to talk about HTML5/JS. Most of the world doesn’t give a **** about SL/WPF. Talking to the wider world about SL/WPF sends a message (rightly or wrongly) of MS-centric, proprietary-ness and decline. Talking and embracing HTML5/JS gets peoples attention.

    I honestly expect to be doing SL/WPF/.NET for many years to come.


  • Jamie

    Moving to a unified way of doing things where you have to do everything in JavaScript would be like coming away from the tower of babel deciding that from now on, everyone would speak nothing but Pig Latin.

    Eingbay orcedfay otay useway Avascriptjay orfay allway ientclay evelopmentday ouldway ucksay.

  • Ryan

    C# for managed code, C++ for native and leave the GUI stuff to HTML/css/js. Sounds like a good plan to me.

    Just this afternoon I was sitting in WPF, wishing that I could use a js-style callback model instead of codebehind (or MVVM for that matter).

    I’m sure that the smart people in Microsoft’s development team will be the first to admit that C# (and compiled language in general) aren’t very well suited to GUI development. Take their MVC framework: sure, it’s a massive improvement on ASP.NET WebForms, but compare to Ruby or Python it’s clunky and eventually annoying.

    But the compiler catches bugs, I hear you say. Sure it does. So why are you writing unit tests? If you’re writing unit tests, then why not just go the whole hog and just work with a dynamic language?

  • Bob F

    My guess is that Microsoft is simply adopting JavaScript as another .NET language to join C#, F#, and VB. That would be relatively easy to do and would explain Microsoft’s statement that JavaScript will have access to Windows’ full capabilities. HTML5 will perhaps be an alternative to the use of XAML. .NET is a perfect platform since its bytecode can be made to run on ARM processors relatively easily. The resulting .NET apps would run on both PCs and tablets without the need for separate compiles.

    To be honest, I can’t think of any other explanation that even begins to make any sense. But if my guess is correct then Sinofsky blundered badly in his presentation and Microsoft needs to quickly step forward with a clarification. We don’t need details, but we need confirmation that .NET has a future.

  • Jamie

    Huh? How can you possibly say that compiled languages aren’t good for building GUI? You do know that almost every rich UI ever built (and I’m talking about stuff WAY more rich than anything the web has ever seen) has been in a compiled language right?

    There is nothing intrinsically good or bad about doing UI in a compiled language. Whether the language is compiled or not is pretty much 100% irrelevant to how well it handles UI.

  • Vic Klien

    @Tim: “… it is bewildering that Microsoft is being so careless with this critical part of its platform …”.

    Someone like Sinofsky would probably argue that this is not being careless. Ruthless and calculating, but not careless. From this angle, the anguished wails from SL/WPF/.NET devs are actually a positive. Those wails prove to the non-MS world that MS is really serious. If MS wimps out and “clarifies” too early that SL/WPF/.NET are still central to Windows, the non-MS world can conclude “Oh, they weren’t really serious about HTML5/JS”.

    The wailing from MS’s own “children” makes news (of which your blog-post is a part), draws attention and shows a “brutal” sincerity.

    MS is in a war for survival. This is a classic case of “killing thousands to save millions”.


  • Kasimier

    @Vic: “This is a classic case of “killing thousands to save millions””

    You mean like in killing thousands of developers to save millions of dollars?

    Best regards,
    Kasimier Buchcik

  • Vic Klien

    @Kasimier: Re. “killing thousands of developers to save millions of dollars”: I’d change that to: “temporarily irritating thousands of devs, to save the larger platform those devs make millions of dollars from”. The decline of MS and Windows has already destroyed hundreds of billions of dollars in MS market value. I see the embracing of HTML5/JS as a bold strategic gamble to keep MS/Windows relevant.

    Just to be clear, I think MS will _eventually_ make it clear that SL/WPF/.NET are still central to Windows development, at least for LOB/Enterprise apps.


  • yarrr

    The fretting is pointless… there will be a good development story for .NET and native developers. The big question is on whether those writing .NET and native apps will be writing some javascript too? And I can see that being answered a few different ways.

    Those writing C++ apps will probably have the underlying API available to them but they’ll probably will be writing a lot of javascript. Kind of like where Qt5 is going. Those writing .NET applications will probably be able to avoid javascript.

  • Kasimier

    @Vic: “Eventually”. That’s the problem. You might have some insider info regarding the path MS will actually make us walk on. But do we need a company full of teenagers engaging in “It’s all for the good. We have secret plan hidden beneath all those partner-company-destroying revelations we spit out”. This code smells. Whatever political / marketing reasons are currently running, something went wrong in the first place and we don’t like our intelligence to be insulted by a bunch of kids playing with teddy bears. I.e. this situation is silly and destructive and this means: the actors let it come to a point where a situation can only be fixed with silly, irritating and destructive games. I don’t like that. It’s not wise. Makes me feel worried about future operations of MS.

    Best regards,
    Kasimier Buchcik

  • Storm14K

    You all that think MS won’t drop a technology should go back and read the comment by Fortis Bonitas again. Not only VB but remember ASP and how that was dropped for ASP.Net with no sort of bridge. I really don’t know why some people cling so tightly to MS. MS doesn’t innovate. They follow. And when they start getting to far behind they will cut you and your technology off at the knees to do catch up to what everyone else is doing. Right now Google and Apple are racing a bottom up race changing the landscape starting from phones into a tablet market that MS never could get going and both heading into the desktop in their own ways. MS has to cut them off and this is it. The hottest development these days is not going on in .Net or really any other desktop technology. If you want to get developers flocking to you it better be with HTML 5, Javascript etc. Thats what MS is trying to do.

    None of this should worry you if you don’t tie yourself into exclusively into MS technology. There are many other systems, platforms, IDE’s etc that are just as good and better. I know because I work with them side by side with MS tools all the time. I welcome this whole change by MS because one way or another this will usher in a lot more openess and cross platform application development.

  • Vic Klien

    @Kasimier: No inside information here. I understand that you are angry about the lack of information and agree that anger is reasonable. I’m just offering a hypothesis that might explain the thinking behind it.

    FWIW: I’ve been working with SL/WPF for the last 3+ years. Am I going to drop that? And move to what? If I really had to switch, I could re-write the UI in WinForms, or even native Win32. I’m sticking with SL/WPF because it’s a reasonable platform for now. Frameworks come and go, but the core functionality of an app is what’s really important.


  • 8r13n

    Dude, you can run .NET and Silverlight in an HTML container. If your app needs to do anything with the PC run it as a service, etc. The Tiled mode DOES HAVE .NET SUPPORT, now the real question is will they make it easier for us then everyone else. But even as is, this won’t be a difficult platform for me to code against. 😛

  • As i know MS newer did leave developers behinde, remember Visual Basic now for the today market you use VB Net, before you use Java then Microsoft came with C# and so on. My point is that MS will come with some enhancment to the platform so existing languages we cane use to build HTML 5 and Javascript like (Script#).
    Sorry for my bad english

  • Frank C

    Well, you hang around software development with Microsoft products long enough you see this scenario play out over and over again. About every 10 years or so, Microsoft makes radical changes to their software development platform.

    In the late 80’s at the start of my programming career, I used QuickBasic, along with C and MASM. Then Windows and tools like VB came along in the early 90’s. Next, in 2001, here comes .NET which is quite different from classic VB and has a sorta new language that MS is pushing C#. Now, here we are 10 years later and, surprise, another big change is brewing in Microsoft’s development tools division.

  • Microsoft’s future is dev. Silverlight isn’t going anywhere. With Azure taking center stage, attention is turning from infrastructure and IT pros to apps and developers. And with the current emphasis on Silverlight and WPF, and Microsoft’s own products being built on Silverlight, I find it hard to believe that Microsoft would turn their back on it. The toolset needs to continue to grow, becoming increasingly rich and robust, which will probably mean new tools. But that is a good thing, and I’m with @8r13n…no one said Silverlight won’t work or that you can’t use. I expect Silverlight will continue to be a great tool for Win8 platforms and beyond.

  • Jim D

    Windows needs some answer to the iPad and Android tablets.
    Windows needs its APIs to appeal to developers other than just C/C++.
    Windows needs to make sure its APIs can be adopted on day 1 of shipping – not to depend on some 3rd party framework like .NET.
    Windows got burned by .NET in the Vista era and doesn’t care for .NET – it’s irrelevant.
    Windows needs an application store which usually means that the applications must be written in some sandboxed technology, not native.

    Windows 8 = 5 birds killed with 1 stone.

  • tim

    Jim, .NET is not a 3rd party framework, and is sandboxed.


  • Jim D

    If you’re the Windows team then .NET is very much a 3rd party framework because you don’t own it, or its ship schedule or its feature list.

    .NET is sandboxed so would work in an application store but it’s not as popular as HTML/JS and Windows doesn’t like it so…

  • Neil Hewitt

    That there appears to be such hostility and internal competition between the Windows and Dev divisions at Microsoft is cause for concern. How can they expect to be successful if they don’t have a joined-up strategy? It’s one thing for directly competitive projects to clash – remember Lisa vs Mac back in the early Apple days – but quite another for divisions which *ought* to be symbiotic. Windows provides the platform, DevDiv provides the tooling. If that’s broken down then the organisation itself is fundamentally broken.

    Sinofsky ships stuff, he gave us Office and Windows 7, so I find it hard to condemn him, but this apparent war against all things .NET will only damage the brand for the one community that still genuinely likes Microsoft – its developer community. Were Ballmer a truly savvy CEO then he’d have Sinofsky on the carpet right now and there’d have been a hasty post-Muglia style ‘clarification’, and several hundred thousand developers and interested parties would not be at reading all about how much Microsoft currently sucks. It’s a PR disaster, at least within that community. And it’s not a community Microsoft can just ignore, no matter what the Windows team thinks. Are they really that deluded?

    Fine, Microsoft, become disliked – or at least nothinged – by everyone; become the new IBM. You can stil be financially very successful, just like IBM is. But you will no longer be in the driving seat, or in with a shot of taking it back from Google and Apple. And when Windows dies, even if it’s thirty years from now, you’ll become irrelevant.

    Wow – I’m surprised how angry this whole thing is making me, even though I’m a Web developer by trade and in theory this move should make life easy for me if I want to develop ‘new’ Windows apps. Haven’t felt this annoyed with Microsoft for a *long* time 🙂


  • Roy Tynan

    I wonder which tile the Blue Screen of Death will appear in

  • Don

    Developers,developers ,developers,developers, developers,developers, we are going to screw developers!

  • Kasimier

    @Vic: “I’ve been working with SL/WPF for the last 3+ years. Am I going to drop that? And move to what? If I really had to switch, I could re-write the UI in WinForms, or even native Win32. I’m sticking with SL/WPF because it’s a reasonable platform for now. Frameworks come and go, but the core functionality of an app is what’s really important.”

    The difference over here is that I’m doing WPF/SL development for *free* now. I cannot find any customers who want to pay for WPF/SL apps; they are all too scared wrt the future. I don’t understand what MS is doing here. MS is producing headlines with big neon HTML/JS letters. This is what customers read and understand; they won’t listen to subleties related to Jupiter. MS is not *that* naive to know that, thus it is responsible for the mess. I’m located in Kiel, Germany. Currently, and partly, I earn the most of my living by refactoring a WinForms/ASP.NET monster and we’re planning to go full ASP.NET in the future; which will cost our customers much more than a WPF Fat Client. WPF/SL is just a hobby now, which I enjoy more than everything else, but it’s just a hobby and this is really, really sad. It makes no sense to me and should not make sense to anyone else beside specific braindead and please-to-be-transferred-to-a-lonely-island MS executives.

    Best regards,
    Kasimier Buchcik

  • Kasimier

    @Vic: I should replace all occurrences of “braindead” in my writings with “irresponsible”. Those guys are sadly not braindead (easily recognizable) but just irresponsible children who need some weeks of hard real work at a shop in order to f*** the decadence of out of them and calibrate their reality processor.

    Best regards,
    Kasimier Buchcik

  • Vic Klien

    I agree the handling of this and the conflict within MS is disturbing. I recently read an article which suggested that replacing Steve Ballmer wasn’t really what was necessary. Rather it was finding a replacement for Gates (which probably is as unlikely as replacing Steve Jobs at Apple). MS rose to power with Gates as a unifying technical lead, but now it seems we are left with multiple, unsupervised power centers (eg. WinDiv/DevDiv) pulling in different directions.

    So why should we continue to invest in learning about and working with SL/WPF? Because although the technology isn’t perfect, and it _may_possibly_ not receive a lot of future investment from MS, it is here now, fairly complete, and fairly well supported (documentation, samples, etc.). These new hypothetical frameworks that will be introduced with Win8 will presumably have some technical advantages (like better perf in some use cases), but also be immature. Look how long it has taken to get the SL/WPF tooling and supporting control classes to where they are now. If I need to deliver a rich client application in the next 1-2 years on Windows, I’d prefer to do it with a semi-mature toolset and framework.


  • Phill

    I think everyone seems to be missing an important point here. Microsoft makes money selling Windows and Office which runs on Windows. Most people run Windows because that’s what all the apps they use run on and because they’re used to it.
    If Microsoft move completely to a dev model based on HTML/JS then the apps that are created will run on any OS. That means in a few years time when legacy apps are obsolete then nobody needs to run Windows anymore – they just need to run an OS with a browser.
    If they put in a load of hooks to underlying Windows functions they’re back where they were years ago being slated for not being standards compliant.
    I think this is all a poorly managed PR exercise by Microsoft to show how committed they are to HTML5. There will be an announcement at BUILD that as well as supporting HTML5, Silverlight will be used to develop rich apps for W8 (the Jupiter project). There will also be a new app store to buy all the fancy new apps, and hopefully a new app deployment model that doesn’t mean a load of registry entries, files dumped all over the filesystem, a secure sandbox, and a simple drag-to-recycle-bin method of deleting an app.
    It’s a good thing I think and .NET and Silverlight is not going anywhere. WPF will die but in a way that sees it merged with Silverlight. Let’s just hope this PR blunder doesn’t scare off all the Microsoft devs in the meantime.

  • Matthew

    Microsoft will not abandon it’s bread and butter it’s just trying to attract more gravy.
    You guy are overreacting.


  • @tim
    “While I agree with you, it is not surprising that .NET developers worry when Microsoft comes out and says the new Windows client platform is for HTML and JavaScript. It would have been easy to add that there is a great .NET story too but we are keeping it under wraps.”

    Just terminology wise I think its worth being clear, even if they did go fro HTML/JS on client its quite possible server side would be .NET (including for example using JQuery/ASP.NET MVC).

  • GaryM

    Take a business rather than developers perspective for a moment.

    Microsoft’s core profits came from PC Applications, Operating Systems and some high end business packages, all PC oriented. “.NET” was concieved as, a better Java and a better Visual Basic/MFC for building desk-top applications, business applications and “software-as-a-service” frameworks. Windows CE development was a travesty of mismanagement, as support for “.NET” technology was imposed on it, when thin-clent technology was the only thing that meant sense.

    In the meantime Apple copied the games industry model of digital distribution (pioneered by Valve’s “Steam”) matching it with attractive portable hardware. Cloud technology based on linux/Unix, emerged as the dominant “Software-as-a-service” technology. The battle grounds are (a) thin client/portable hardware (b) specialist games consoles, and for the business sector (c) cloud services/applications. Microsoft has an edge only in one of these.

    So.. move Scott Guthrie to Azure, at least try and claw back come ground on Cloud, try to leverage the existing “.NET” base. However “.NET” is not the solution to the thin-client/portable hardware problem.

    The result? For desktop applications “.NET” becomes the new MFC. For Azure, expect a “Cloud.NET”. For the consumer market, Appstores and thin-clients without the overhead of “.NET”. However these are areas where Microsoft cannot catch up. NOt technologically, but because its brand is inextricably linked with the Desktop PC, and Desktop PC development.

    We can stay a “.NET” developers and maintain “legacy” systems… or…

  • I think Microsoft has NOT been given the credit I think it deserves for this ploy; designed to achieve three things:

    1) Finally killing the competition: Adobe Flash+Air – browser plug-ins are NOT required if HTML5 is de rigueur. Silverlight is already dead in the public space anyway – so the death of public Silverlight is irrelevant (to Microsoft) AND get brownie-points for being standards compliant into the bargain.

    2) Hurting established app stores: by defining HTML5 as the “open standard” for ALL apps – ie. run your apps NOT just on your iPhone – thus making native (ie. non-HTML5) apps a “legacy” approach now. Windows Phone Marketplace is the Sacrificial Pawn to take the opponents’ Queen: Apple App Store or Google Android Market.

    3) Keeping Microsoft Windows relevant: “everyone” has an iPad and so Windows needs tablet+slate form-factors with excellent UX. Offering Tiled+Classic is brilliant: Microsoft Office (cash cow) can still work in Classic + it’s a portable-ish Tablet when undocked … AND the light 7/10-inch portable slate just runs Tiled on ARM for days/weeks between charges.

    I’m sure there are more reasons but I see this as Microsoft facing-up to reality and about time.

    Pity about Silverlight though – can’t see it appealing any more if it’s just for Intranet apps – I feel this will lose out to HTML5 as well even in this space – who wants to have developers split with such close BUT ultimately totally different skill sets?

  • Dan Barclay

    re: “Microsoft will not abandon it’s bread and butter it’s just trying to attract more gravy.
    You guy are overreacting.”

    Yup. That’s what they said about VB7 as well. Good luck guys. BTDT. Trust me, there is life after MS.

    Dan (former VB MVP)

  • Paul

    Is it not possible that at this Build conference, a new fancy compiler is announced, that will convert your windows forms/wpf/SL applications to HTML/JS?