March 18, 2004Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2360 days ago on March 18, 2004Seen the microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player newsgroup? There are dozens of error reports daily, so much so that other discussion is almost impossible. This is a programming issue: WMP needs to work better and to fail gracefully. The reason for many of the queries is that users frequently see error codes rather than human-readable reports. Users turn to the newsgroup because they see 800700O5, C00D10B3, C00D11C0 and so on. For years, best practice has been not to throw numbers like this in front of the user, except perhaps in small print at the end of a sane error report. I like Windows Media Player but I've seen quality issues too. Here's one: I have WMP configured to copy and play music to/from a network share. If the share is offline, WMP starts and then freezes. Well, I know I am a bad user setting up WMP in this way, but it does make a lot of sense if you don't want little independent music collections all over your network. But the point is that surely WMP could detect this on start-up and give me a friendly message, rather than siezing up. The real killer is that if WMP won't work, you can't get into Tools - Options to correct the problem, without putting the share back online that is. The specific problem matters little. The point is that Microsoft needs to fix WMP fast if it wants to succeed. Especially considering that it may well have to unbundle it from Windows for legal reasons. iRiver 40Gb MP3 player reviewed Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2360 days ago by Joseph T. Bradley • • • ReplyI agree, I use 2 different programs to catagorize my music and name it correctly. Then use WMP to play it. It just seems like with a few modifications and a good service pack MS could fix this thing. 9 was a huge increase over 8, but it still needs some work. Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2359 days ago by robert • • • ReplyI spent an hour last night with my son mucking around with WMP and Real. He simply wanted to record a set of wma files to a CD. After copying the files to "my library", then organizing a playlist, then attempting to burn and getting errors, rummaging through the documentation to find that right-clicking an error actually tells you what the error is, correcting the problems, retrying, ... I couldn't believe the clunkiness of the interface (and I consider myself a well-seasoned computer user). This program does _lots_ of different things, and the interface seems designed more to look pretty than to be functional. Too many options, menus, submenus ... ? Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2359 days ago by Edward • • www • Reply
iTunes handles playing music from a remote share a lot better than WMP. It keeps the local and remote files in seperate hierachies. When you connect to a share it loads in the whole metadata library so you don't have to rescan all the files. Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2359 days ago by Anonymous • • • ReplyWinamp 5 is my pick. Still a bit rough around the edges but the basic design is right - WMP is rough around the edges and basically wrong. ITunes on windows is horrible IMHO, but others obviously like it. Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2358 days ago by edward • • • ReplyThe there a way to get winamp to connect to iTunes shares, a plugin or something? That would be the greatest. Winamp is much ligher on resources than iTunes. Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media PlayerPosted 2358 days ago by Corey Gouker • • www • Reply
You might enjoy reading this nice long list of comments about WMP... I'd really enjoy any additions you could possibly add as well. |
Recent postsUsers plead with Borland to give up .NETIE7 to be released 18th October,... If Microsoft doesn't use UAC, why... Google's unsettling lack of direction Vista security: now prove it |
Re: Microsoft: improve Windows Media Player
Posted 2360 days ago by John Schroedl • • • ReplyIf you think WMP is bad, try iTunes. You'll come running back with hugs n' kisses. I did. It's truly horrible software (The Windows version is at least).
I've been a quite satisfied WMP user for 2 months - no errors but maybe I'm too kind on it.